Thursday, May 21, 2009

Use of Wind Turbines to Capture Energy from Air Exhaust

There are several air exhaust applications where large volume of air is pumped externally continuously. Examples are: Coal mines; covered parking lots; and, industrial air handling systems. The first two applications extract contaminated air necessary to maintain satisfactory air quality, and the third application is to use air to transport materials, remove moisture, etc.

Using the above examples, a natural assumption is that the exhaust emissions can be captured and converted into useable energy. Let us consider a few scenarios:

  1. Attach a wind turbine directly to the exhaust. In this scenario the exhaust air (speed = Va, Kinetic energy = Ka) is directly fed to the turbine; the turbine extracts (Kb), a fraction of the kinetic energy in the wind; the remaining kinetic energy is expelled (Kc) with wind speed = Vc. In this scenario, the turbine is able to extract Kb, which will be less than (Ka – Kc); losses will reduce the amount of electrical energy generated.

    Assume that the original exhaust system used K0 amount of energy, which produced an exhaust with kinetic energy of Ka.

    At this point let us ask the question, what if the exhaust system reduced the amount of energy used from K0 to K0 – Kb? This would lower the exhaust kinetic energy from Ka to Kc, assuming no losses. So placing an exhaust turbine is equivalent to reducing the input energy of the system.

    Therefore, when losses are taken into account, it is more energy efficient to reduce the input energy rather than install an exhaust turbine. Of course reducing the input energy does not cost anything, whereas installing a turbine incurs a cost.

    To recap, it is much more efficient to reduce the overall energy consumption of the system from K0 to K0-Kb, rather than place a turbine to extract Kb energy. Both lead to expulsion of Kc amount of energy.

    So in this scenario an exhaust turbine does not make sense.

  2. Place a wind turbine at some distance from and in relation to the exhaust duct. In this situation significant energy will be lost to the outside and the other energy that hits the turbine can be conceptually viewed as a tube of air that is subject to exactly the same analysis as was conducted in item 1. So for this tube of air it is better to reduce the amount of input energy as opposed to recovering it using a wind turbine.

In conclusion, although the exhaust wind turbine idea seems promising conceptually, it is not.

Article written by Dr. Pramod Jain

Email Pramod at pramod@frombeginningtowind.com

Visit Wind Energy Consulting and Contracting Inc.

9 comments:

  1. Just a thought. "Let us ask the question, what if the exhaust system reduced the amount of energy used from K0 to K0 – Kb?"

    How can one do that ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please go through the research paper
    "Exhaust Air and Wind Energy Recovery System for Clean Energy Generation"
    www.ipcbee.com/vol12/9-C027.pdf
    And offer your comment.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I disagree...

    Firstly the common misconception in the calculations regarding exhaust air capture for energy recovery is one where the kinetic energy is derived from the ventilation fan driving the turbine, in this instance yes the force required to push the turbine would create a disproportionately large load on the generating fan and therefore make the whole process ineffective and not efficient.

    The way to approach the system design and the physical attributes of the concept is to look at capturing the air flow from a point at which interruption of the air flow would have a negligible effect on the generating fan, at this point the captured kinetic energy from the flowing air is purely recycled energy that would otherwise go to waste.

    The question is how at this point or at this distance can his be achieved effectively. well 99.9% of all conventional horizontal axis wind turbines when mounted over an exhaust air flow have too higher torque ratio to rotate fast enough to produce enough power to become cost effective. Yes there are smaller turbines that have lower torque ratio's but these then by nature have a smaller swept area and then also become less effective. The Windtronics BTPS6500 wind turbine though is by far the exception to the norm. With the turbine having the generating aspect at the blade tips rather than the blades rotating a central generator the torque ratio is extremely low, the turbine will start to rotate in air flow of negligible force, at 0.8m/s it will rotate and start to generate power. The twist is that with this technology the turbine has a swept area of 2m diameter so the air flow able to be captured is vast, the low torque will not hinder the air flow but convert the kinetic energy into electrical energy efficiently and highly productively.

    There is though a balance with placement of the turbine and it's proximity to the generating fan, the closer the more power, in common test systems the value will create a back pressure on the generator of 0.3mmHG, given that a brand new clean air filter being installed over a fan of an HVAC or similar unit creates a back pressure of around 30mmHG you can see that the effect is negligible. This value can be brought down to 0.0mmHG with a slightly increased gap between the generator and the fan a moderate reduction in yield would be noticed but nothing more than around 10%.

    BAC (Baltimore Aircoil Company) in the US have been trialling this technology for a while, they are the largest air cooling tower manufacturer in the USA, they are seeing such beneficial results from this technology that they have partnered with Windtronics. So Dr Pramod Jain is unfortunately behind the times, yes in a traditional sense the statement is correct but technology has moved on.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i am also thinking about the same thing,but the main problem is that what would be the impact on the current consumption of the fan

    ReplyDelete
  5. There will be no effect on the consumption of power by fan ,for more details contact sureshkito@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. If one could get 1 kw electricity with wasted exhaust air, is not a loss.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I want to install exhaust wind turbine 1000KW 1.5 meter away from poultry exhaust fans to generate electricity for residence in the farm and for shower block and mess. We have 12 such fans throwing air @ 6m/s and working for 24/7 . I want to use wind energy which is wasted any way to produce electricity. Please if any of you have idea to install what type of wind turbine in front of 1400 mm fan dia cone. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hi
      it was my plan and i am researching abbout it.u can contact to me on email.we can share our plans.

      Delete
  8. Casinos Near Casinos Near Carson, NV - MapYRO
    Find Casinos Near Carson, NV near Carson in minutes. 성남 출장마사지 Find 동두천 출장마사지 an 군산 출장마사지 area near Casinos Near Carson Hotel and Casino, 세종특별자치 출장샵 and other similar places to 포항 출장마사지 stay closest to casinos in

    ReplyDelete